The job search can occasionally feel as effective as chucking a stack of resumes off of a seaside cliff. No doubt there’s more than one discouraged applicant out there feeling that they’re as likely to hear a response from a hiring manager as they would be to get a “do you mind?” from the ocean down below.

Job seekers can’t help but ask “how many applications does it take, on average, to land a job?” Unfortunately, we don’t have the hard science right now to give you a straight answer on that topic. But we can tell you why you’re having so much trouble. There are plenty of factors that are contributing to your applications disappearing into the void.

Our recent research found that only 13% of job applicants were given a job interview. And of those that managed to make it to the interview process, only a few people were offered a position. That puts your chances of landing the average job you apply for at less than 2%.

First, let us explain why most resumes end up in a black hole.

What Gives?

The average HR manager spends less than 7 seconds looking at the average resume. And they’re looking at your application with “no” on their minds, trying to find any reason to disqualify you. This is only after the hundreds of resumes have likely been picked over by a bot that scrapes resumes for appropriate keywords and chucks the ones it finds unsatisfactory.

The odds aren’t in your favor. But they aren’t in anyone’s favor, if we’re being honest. Does that help?

What To Do About It

We’re not here to help applicants wallow, we’re here to give them hope. After all, finding the right jobs for the right people is what we do. You need to bump up your application anyway that you can. Here’s a few quick ways that you can game the system to make sure that your resume lands in the lap of an HR manager and might even catch their eye.

 

 

Still not getting it?

We have your back. For just $10 a month, we can optimize your resume for you. We use AI to determine what it is that recruiters are looking for, scanning thousands of job openings and optimizing your resume to garner the biggest response. Then, we send that resume out for you to openings that match your particular skills. It’s a system that works, we guarantee it.

 

3 comments

  1. That this company had to shut down might give some indication as to why so many applicants, to use TalentWorks’ expression, “wallow.” If the experts knew how to guarantee applicants would get a job, then those particular experts would be rich. Because so many millions desperately NEED (let alone “want”) jobs. US figures show the number of job seekers exceeds the number of available positions–and this has remained so over the past thirty years of data collection. The problem is there are far too many seeking jobs relative to the jobs available. Other selection criteria (like the search for a living wage job…) exacerbate the already unfavorable success odds.

    Other research shows that, thanks to how common it has become for applicants to have at least one university degree and at least some certification or an internship, the expectations for even low-pay entry level positions have sky-rocketed, worsening competition. But instead of addressing the problematic dynamics at the core of the job problem in the US, most of us accept the worsening problem and just scramble to try to adapt to it.

    We don’t need new technology. We need a new system that works for the average American. If a job is a survival requirement (to acquire money to pay for survival needs like housing…), then every American who wants a job ought to have one.

  2. “US figures show the number of job seekers exceeds the number of available positions–and this has remained so over the past thirty years of data collection. The problem is there are far too many seeking jobs relative to the jobs available. Other selection criteria (like the search for a living wage job…) exacerbate the already unfavorable success odds. ”

    This is is misleading and partially incorrect.
    1. The national unemployment rate is at record lows.
    2. In many local areas employers have job openings that remain unfilled for months because there are more openings than people to fill them. Employers in those situations have been needing to get creative to lure employees.
    3. A minimum wage job is not the same as a living wage job and was never intended to be the same. Minimum wage jobs are typically entry-level in which just about anyone (even those with handicaps to some degree) can thrive. Granted, some older adults are in these positions but that doesn’t automatically modify the job to now require the employer to pay a living wage. A wage is dependent on the skills, experience and knowledge required to do the job, not the family size and other obligations of the employee. If one wants to *earn* a living wage then one needs to qualify for a job that pays as such rather than expecting a living wage to be paid regardless of the job.

Leave a Reply